BUSINESS LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

BUSINESS LAW - Essay ExampleIn our effect, Colins Computer (CC) is a computer garage broadening repair function for computers belonging to other(a) organizations, in return for a monthly payment. Colins Computers advertises its services done their website and through a local anesthetic daily, which reaches the intended organizations that have the need for Computer repair, among them, Geoffs Gym (GG). After receiving the information regarding CCs services and the discount offer they be giving to their new customers, GG decides to go for the services and fulfill the requisite conditions that were attached by CC, so that it could benefit from the offering. However, as it turned out, GG never received the repair services for its computers from CC, which in essence did not receive the letter that was to be sent either through mail, text edition or post to confirm the offer. The occurrences that follows after GG finds the services of CC and opts to purchase them are the subject of this discussion, with a focus on whether a contract occurred, who is liable for the breach of the contract, and whether the contract is enforceable through a court of law, if at all it occurred. ... reat, it invited the organizations in need of computer repair services to make an offer, which would in turn be accepted by CC, based on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The conditions attached for an offer to become complete were that the organization in need of the services would contact CC either through mail, post or text before 8th June and inform them of the definitive date the organization would bid the services to commence. On its side, GG posted a letter on 3rd June and followed the letter up, with a bring down to confirm to CC that the letter of offer had been posted. However, it turned out that the letter was not receive by CC, that is why CC did not go to offer the repair services to GGs computers. The situations of this case point that an offer was made, but the co rresponding requirement of acceptance did not occur (Simpson, 1987). According to the ruling of the case in Partridge Vs Crittenden (1968), the display of goods by the seller does not amount to an offer, but rather an invitation to treat. The comparable applies to an advertisement made by the seller. Therefore, even when GG would want to enforce the contract based on the fact that they had accepted the terms made by CC, by posting a letter before the verbalize date, and even went ahead to follow it up with a phone call, just to confirm that they had posted the letter, they are not in a position to do this, because the advertisement made by CC on its websites and a local daily, regarding its offer of computer repair services, did not amount to an offer, but a unblemished invitation to treat (Koffman & Macdonald, 2007). Therefore, contrary to the belief by GG that they had met the requirement of the contract and thus CC was liable to constitute them for the breach of the contract, the reality is different. GG